基于数量化理论的露天矿安全风险评价

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.S1.016

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (S1): 86-91.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.S1.016

• 安全社会科学与安全管理 • 上一篇下一篇

基于数量化理论的露天矿安全风险评价

尹一雄工程师

国家能源集团新疆能源有限责任公司, 新疆乌鲁木齐, 830002

收稿日期:2021-09-26 修回日期:2021-11-08 出版日期:2021-12-30 发布日期:2022-06-30
作者简介:尹一雄 (1988—),男,四川成都人,本科,工程师,主要从事机电与安全生产管理工作。E-mail:251555701@qq.com。

Safety risk assessment of open-pit mines based on quantitative theory

YIN Yixiong

Xinjiang Energy Co., Ltd., CHN Energy, Urumqi Xinjiang 830002, China

Received:2021-09-26 Revised:2021-11-08 Online:2021-12-30 Published:2022-06-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为提高露天矿安全管理水平,以黑山露天矿为例,基于人员因素及管理制度、边坡管理及防治、采场安全管理和交通运输安全管理4个项目,建立17个子项目和52个子类目的综合评价指标;采用数量化理论优化指标赋权,并结合综合指数法,对该矿作安全风险评价。结果表明:露天矿风险状态受多指标综合影响,危险指数越大,风险等级越高;管理系统中人员流失、安全作业技术措施等方面存在进一步提高的空间;爆破作业的规范、防治措施、交通情况等指标属于敏感指标,需要在后续的生产中继续重点管理。

关键词: 数量化理论, 露天矿, 安全风险评价, 综合指数法, 安全管理

Abstract: In order to improve safety management of open-pit coal mines, with Heishan mine as an example, comprehensive evaluation indicators were developed with 17 sub projects and 52 sub categories from four aspects of personnel factors and management system, slope management and prevention, stope safety management and transportation safety management. Then, index weighting was optimized by adopting quantitative theory, and safety risk assessment of the mine was carried out by using comprehensive index method. The results show that risk status of open-pit mines is influenced by a combination of multiple indicators. In general, the higher the hazard index is, the higher risk level it will have. And there is room for further improvement in its management system in terms of personnel turnover and technical measures for safe operation. Meanwhile, indicators such as specification of blasting operations, prevention and control measures, and traffic conditions are sensitive, and should be taken as focus in management during subsequent production.

Key words: open-pit mines, quantitative theory, safety risk evaluation, comprehensive index method, safety management

中图分类号:

X936

尹一雄. 基于数量化理论的露天矿安全风险评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(S1): 86-91.

YIN Yixiong. Safety risk assessment of open-pit mines based on quantitative theory[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(S1): 86-91.

参考文献

[1] 田会, 才庆祥, 甄选. 中国露天采煤事业的发展展望[J]. 煤炭工程, 2014,46(10): 11-14.
TIAN Hui, CAI Qingxiang, ZHEN Xuan. Development prospects of surface coal mining industry in China [J]. Coal Engineering, 2014,46(10): 11-14.
[2] 张军, 杨维平, 杨立功, 等. 模糊综合评判在露天矿安全评价中的应用[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2011,11(6): 259-263.
ZHANG Jun, YANG Weiping, YANG Ligong, et al. Comprehensive fuzzy evaluation method and its application to the open-air mine safety forecasting [J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2011, 11(6): 259-263.
[3] 张鹏, 陈孝国, 张红芬, 等. 露天矿边坡危险度的直觉模糊熵权法评价模型[J]. 煤炭工程, 2018, 50(8): 153-157.
ZHANG Peng, CHEN Xiaoguo, ZHANG Hongfen, et al. Evaluation model of open-pit slope risk based on intuitionistic fuzzy entropy weight method [J]. Coal Engineering, 2018, 50(8): 153-157.
[4] 陈光伸, 胡辉, 胡涛, 等. 基于AHP-SCA-模糊综合评价法的露天矿安全评价应用研究[J]. 有色金属:矿山部分, 2021,73(2): 47-52.
CHEN Guangshen, HU Hui, HU Tao, et al. Application research on the open-pit safety evaluation on the basis of AHP-SCA-Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method [J]. Nonferrous Metals:Mining Part, 2021, 73(2): 47-52.
[5] 贾宝山, 尹彬, 王翰钊, 等. AHP耦合TOPSIS的煤矿安全评价模型及其应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2015,25(8): 99-105.
JIA Baoshan, YIN Bin, WANG Hanzhao, et al. AHP coupled TOPSIS-based model for evaluating coal mine safety and its application [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2015, 25(8): 99-105.
[6] 周忠科, 王立杰. 基于BP神经网络的煤矿安全预警评估机制研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2011,7(4): 134-138.
ZHOU Zhongke, WANG Lijie. Study on safety early-warning assessment in coal mine based on BP neural networks [J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2011, 7(4): 134-138.
[7] 李运强, 程五一, 南玮超. 基于BP网络的矿井安全状况综合评价的研究[J]. 中国矿业, 2006,15(7): 80-83.
LI Yunqiang, CHENG Wuyi, NAN Weichao. Study on comprehensive safety assessment of coal mines based on BP neural network [J]. China Mining Magazine, 2006, 15(7): 80-83.
[8] LAARHOVEN P M J V, PEDRYCZ W. A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory [J]. Fuzzy Sets & Systems, 1983, 11(13):199-227.
[9] ZEEMAN E C. Bifurcation, catastrophe, and turbulence [M]. New York:Springer, 1982:7-11.
[10] 马金山, 姬长生. 煤矿安全管理效率研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2014, 24(11):3-9.
MA Jinshan, JI Changsheng. Research on efficiency of coal mine safety management [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2014, 24(11):3-9.
[11] 周光亚, 董文泉, 夏立显. 关于数量化理论Ⅰ、Ⅱ的数学模型[J]. 吉林大学自然科学学报, 1979,17(1): 11-18.
ZHOU Guangya,DONG Wenquan,XIA Lixian.On the mathematical models of quantification theories Ⅰ & Ⅱ[J].Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Jilinensis, 1979,17(1): 11-18.
[12] 杨晓龙, 杨芳, 马宏涛,等. 三峡库区缓倾红层滑坡成因机理及体积预测研究[J]. 西北师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2021,57(4):31-37.
YANG Xiaolong, YANG Fang, MA Hongtao, et al. Study on the formation mechanism and volume prediction of gentle red bed landslide in the Three Gorges reservoir area[J]. Journal of Northwest Normal University:Natural Science, 2021,57(4):31-37.
[13] 连瑞锋. 阳煤一矿综放面采空区复合灾害危险性评价及预防措施研究[D].徐州:中国矿业大学,2020.
LIAN Ruifeng. Study on the risk assessment and prevention measures of compound disaster in goaf of yangmei No.1 coal mine[D].Xuzhou:China University of Mining and Technology,2020.
[14] 陈晔.数量化理论在工程地质领域中的运用[J].城市建设理论研究:电子版,2018(9):111.
[15] 董文泉,周光亚,夏立显.数量化理论及其应用[M].长春:吉林人民出版社,1979:27-41.
[16] SMULLYAN R M. A unifying principal in quantification theory [J]. Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1963, 49:828-832.
[17] JIANG Yujing,WANG Chunxiang, ZHAO Xiaodong. Damage assessment of tunnels caused by the 2004 mid niigata prefecture earthquake using Hayashi's quantification theory type Ⅱ[J]. Natural Hazards, 2010,53:425-441.
[18] LANDINI G. Quantification theory in 8 of principia mathematica and the empty domain [J]. History and Philosophy of Logic, 2005, 26:47-59.
[19] 煤矿安全网露天矿事故汇总[EB/OL].[2021-06-10].http://www.mkaq.org/sggl/.

基于数量化理论的露天矿安全风险评价

Safety risk assessment of open-pit mines based on quantitative theory

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张渺. G1-EW组合赋权云模型下地铁运营安全风险评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(6): 163-170.
[2]	冯巩, 夏元友, 王智德, 严敏嘉. 基于位移信息融合的露天矿边坡动态预警方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(3): 116-122.
[3]	李昊, 郝均卫, 李文昌. PDCS安全管理模式研究与应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(2): 22-27.
[4]	张晓明, 刘筱颖, 董伟, 张河猛, 王永军, 佐佐木久郎. 海州露天矿采空区地表CO₂通量的试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(2): 66-73.
[5]	孙志春, 宫广正, 张艳亮, 肖海平, 白翎, 闫卫东. 基于失效模式的电力企业事故分析系统构建[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(S1): 1-7.
[6]	曹勇, 卢云峰, 贺一博, 李明, 刘小杰. 外委承包商安全管理策略研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(S1): 8-13.
[7]	张关存. 建立健全企业安全生产责任制的方法研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(S1): 14-18.
[8]	赵亮, 孙魁元, 韩宝虎, 安文利, 李国强. 基于人工智能视频分析的选煤厂安全管理研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(S1): 19-23.
[9]	石建光. 煤炭洗选加工现状及安全生产管理探讨[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(S1): 29-33.
[10]	乔元, 王建立. 现代煤制油化工安全管理体系的探索与实践[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(S1): 34-38.
[11]	蒋海夫. 基于实例的煤化工建设项目作业许可管理研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(S1): 49-55.
[12]	王志忠. 铁路施工安全管理的桎梏及应对[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(S1): 56-61.
[13]	李倩. 科研院所实验室安全管理方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(S1): 62-67.
[14]	王慧军, 安亮, 高宇龙, 田勇, 郝孟忠, 白爱民. 风险预控管理体系融合ISRS研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(S1): 68-72.
[15]	杨小朋, 闫瑞兵, 彭莉莉. 大型煤炭企业事故致因模型及对策分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(S1): 73-79.